Understanding Why Solid-state Batteries Fail Could Usher in Beyond Lithium-Ion Era

The Faraday Institution’s SOLBAT project has made a significant step in understanding how and why solid-state batteries (SSBs) fail. The research points to strategies that cell manufacturers might use to avoid such failures, potentially accelerating the commercialisation of SSBs.

To significantly improve electric vehicle (EV) battery range and safety at a lower cost, new battery chemistries that are “beyond lithium ion” must be developed. SSBs are one such promising technology, but its mass market adoption has been held back by several key technical challenges that cause the battery to fail when charged and discharged.

SSBs can short circuit after repeating charging and discharging. Two well-recognised causes of battery failure are the growth of dendrites, branching networks of lithium that grow through the solid electrolyte during charging of a battery, and void creation, pores that reduce the area of contact between the electrolyte and negative electrode. Solving these two challenges could potentially usher in a new era of SSB-powered EVs.

By the numbers
70%Potential improvements in energy storage per unit volume over lithium-ion batteries
50%Predicted global use of SSBs in transportation by 2040
30%Predicted global use of SSBs in transportation by 2040
10%Predicted global use of SSBs in aircraft by 2040

The Faraday Institution’s SOLBAT team have discovered a mechanistic relationship between dendrite growth and void formation, which brings the commercial viability of SSBs in electric vehicles a big step closer. Using a combination of cutting edge electrochemical and imaging techniques, the researchers revealed that voids are created when a “critical current density” – that is, the amount of charge per a unit of time – is exceeded. This in turn leads to dendrite growth and ultimately total cell failure. The paper was published in Nature Materials.

Void formation on stripping leads to contact loss, increased stripping polarisation and results in dendrite growth on plating.

This new mechanistic understanding can inform approaches to avoid such cell failures including using physical properties of the battery as “levers” to keep voids and dendrites from forming. With this understanding, the time by which SSBs would appear in commercial vehicles can be accelerated.

The commercial use of SSBs would bring significant benefits. By replacing the flammable organic liquid electrolyte with a solid electrolyte, they would be safer to operate. Use of a solid electrolyte also unlocks the use of a lithium metal anode, and therefore the potential to store up to 70% more energy per unit volume, thus increasing EV range or significantly decreasing battery weight or volume. The use of solid electrolytes also has the potential to speed up the time it takes to charge a battery.

A recent Faraday Insight predicts that SSBs may satisfy 50% of global demand for batteries in consumer electronics, 30% in transportation and over 10% in aircraft by 2040.

It is key to break down the scientific barriers that prevent the progression to market of technologies that will enable our vision of the future of mobility. The study by Oxford researchers is one early example of a scientific advance that the Faraday Institution was set up to drive.”

Tony Harper, Director, Faraday Battery Challenge, UK Research & Innovation


Back to Top